Vermont’s collaborative advantage

Dan Petterson (pictured), Director of Examinations at the Captive Insurance Division of the Vermont Department of Financial Regulation explains why relationships, not just regulation, continue to define the leading captive domicile.

For more than four decades, Vermont has occupied a unique position in the global captive insurance market. While many domiciles have modernised their legislation and strengthened regulatory frameworks, Vermont continues to differentiate itself through something less tangible but arguably more valuable: a culture of collaboration built on trust, experience and continuous dialogue.

According to Petterson, that collaborative ethos remains central to the state's success. Rather than viewing regulation and innovation as competing priorities, Vermont has spent more than 45 years demonstrating that they can reinforce one another.

As captive insurance enters an era defined by cyber risk, artificial intelligence (AI), geopolitical uncertainty and increasingly sophisticated risk financing strategies, Petterson believes Vermont's relationship-driven regulatory model will be more important than ever.

Collaboration built over decades

Vermont's reputation as a captive domicile did not emerge overnight. Petterson said the state's regulatory relationships have evolved alongside the captive industry itself.

“Over the past forty-five years, the relationship between regulators, legislators, and the captive industry has naturally evolved as the industry itself has matured,” he said. “What hasn't changed is the commitment to working together to ensure Vermont remains both a well-regulated and innovative captive domicile.”

During the industry's formative years, the priority was establishing credibility through a robust regulatory framework. Today, that relationship has become far more collaborative.

“In the early years, much of the focus was on establishing a strong regulatory framework and building confidence in Vermont as a captive domicile. Today, that relationship has evolved into an ongoing partnership built on trust, open communication, and a shared commitment to the long-term success of the industry.”

That partnership extends well beyond the annual legislative calendar. Regulators remain in regular contact with legislators, the Vermont Captive Insurance Association (VCIA), captive owners and service providers throughout the year, creating opportunities to discuss emerging risks before they become pressing regulatory issues.

“We talk about emerging risks, changing business needs, opportunities to improve our laws and regulations, and challenges facing the industry,” Petterson explains. “Those conversations allow us to make informed decisions instead of reacting after issues arise.”

The result is a regulatory ecosystem that is proactive rather than reactive, underpinned by decades of institutional knowledge.

“I also think Vermont benefits from something that can't be created overnight, and that's experience,” he said. “Over more than four decades, we've developed strong professional relationships and a deep level of institutional knowledge.”

Flexibility through consistency

As captive insurance expands into new lines of business and increasingly complex risk financing arrangements, regulators face the challenge of encouraging innovation while maintaining robust oversight.

For Vermont, Petterson believes consistency and flexibility are not opposing concepts.

“Part of Vermont's consistency is its flexibility,” he said.

The state's regulatory model combines rigorous supervision with a willingness to adapt as business models evolve.

“The Department has maintained a regulatory model that balances rigour with the ability to respond as the industry evolves.”

Fundamental regulatory standards remain non-negotiable.

“Insurance is a regulated industry, and captives are insurance companies, so a baseline level of compliance is necessary to legitimise the business and preserve the health of the captive marketplace.”

However, Vermont avoids applying identical regulatory expectations to every captive regardless of size or complexity.

“We work to balance what is required for safe and sound regulation with what makes sense for companies that differ widely in size, complexity, and sophistication.”

Instead, the Department relies on ongoing examinations, surveillance, business plan monitoring and frequent dialogue to develop a detailed understanding of individual captives.

“Our approach is risk focused, which allows us to deploy our resources where they are most needed.”

That philosophy extends to innovation itself.

“We apply judgment not only in how we regulate but also in what we regulate, which allows us to consider innovative ideas thoughtfully and responsibly.”

Whether innovation requires legislative reform or simply regulatory engagement, Petterson said Vermont remains open to discussion.

“Innovation depends on the willingness to hear new ideas, even when they are unconventional, and that openness has been a defining part of Vermont's regulatory approach from the beginning.”

Governance remains the defining characteristic

As captive programmes become increasingly sophisticated, Petterson argues that long-term success is determined less by structure than by governance.

“Although captive insurance companies vary widely in their objectives, risk profiles, and operating models, the most successful programmes consistently demonstrate the same core characteristics.”

Foremost among these is a deep understanding of risk.

“Successful captives have a strong understanding of their own risks,” he said. Organisations with mature risk management capabilities are better equipped to determine appropriate capital levels, refine captive structures and respond effectively when unexpected events occur.

Leadership is equally important.

“Experienced professionals who understand the organisation's business and strategic objectives are essential.”

This extends beyond internal management teams to external advisers, including captive managers, actuaries, auditors and legal counsel, whose collective expertise helps captives adapt as their risk profiles evolve.

Strong governance also requires boards to treat the captive as a strategic business asset rather than merely an insurance vehicle.

“The most successful captive owners have engaged boards and management teams that view the captive as a strategic component of the enterprise rather than simply as an insurance company or compliance obligation.”

From the regulator's perspective, communication remains another defining feature.

“Many of Vermont's most successful captive insurers routinely engage with us, not only when times are tough, but also when business is performing well.”

Those conversations foster transparency while giving regulators the context needed to exercise informed judgement.

Legislative evolution through continuous dialogue

Vermont's captive legislation has evolved steadily over four decades, but Petterson emphasises that legislative reform is never viewed as a one-off exercise.

“The process is continuous and highly collaborative.”

Ideas emerge from multiple sources, whether changing market conditions, new captive structures or practical operational experience.

“Sometimes they are driven by changes in the marketplace or new types of captive structures. Other times they stem from practical experience as captive owners, managers, and regulators identify opportunities to improve efficiency.”

Each proposal is assessed carefully.

“We consider not only the benefit it may provide to captive insurers, but also its broader impact on Vermont's regulatory framework and our ability to maintain strong policyholder protection and regulatory oversight.”

Compromise also forms part of the process.

“Not every proposal moves forward immediately, and many ideas are refined over multiple years before there is broad consensus that they are the right fit for Vermont.”

Rather than pursuing sweeping reforms, Vermont has favoured measured legislative evolution that preserves regulatory confidence while responding to changing industry needs.

“In many ways, the process never really ends,” Petterson said. “By the time one legislative session concludes, conversations are already underway about future opportunities.”

Preparing for a more complex future

Looking ahead, Petterson expects captive owners to face an increasingly interconnected risk environment.

“The next five years are likely to be characterised by continued uncertainty.”

Geopolitical instability, inflation, supply chain disruption, climate-related losses, evolving legal requirements and financial market volatility will all influence captive strategies.

Technology presents perhaps the greatest dual challenge.

“Technology presents both one of the greatest challenges and one of the greatest opportunities.”

Cyber threats continue to evolve rapidly, while AI is reshaping both operational and underwriting risks.

“Captives will continue to play an important role by providing additional capacity, supporting cyber risk financing strategies, and facilitating access to specialised cyber response and recovery resources.”

At the same time, technological innovation offers powerful new analytical capabilities.

“Advances in data analytics, predictive modelling, artificial intelligence, and real-time monitoring are giving organisations better insight into their risks than ever before.”

Captive owners that harness those capabilities effectively will improve underwriting, capital allocation, pricing and loss prevention.

“In many respects, the organisations that make the best use of data will have a meaningful competitive advantage.”

For Vermont, supporting that evolution requires constant engagement rather than static regulation.

“Our role is to ensure that our regulatory framework continues to evolve alongside these changes.”

People remain Vermont's greatest differentiator

While legislative frameworks and regulatory standards matter, Petterson ultimately believes Vermont's greatest strength lies elsewhere.

“I think Vermont will continue to stand out for the same reasons it has for more than forty years. We've never been satisfied with standing still.”

More importantly, he said, “Vermont's biggest differentiator isn't a statute or a regulation. It's the people.”

The state's experienced network of regulators, captive managers, actuaries, lawyers, accountants, legislators and service providers creates an environment where problems can be discussed openly and resolved thoughtfully.

Its regulatory philosophy also remains highly individualised.

“We don't believe in a one size fits all approach.”

Instead, regulators seek to understand each captive's business model before making supervisory decisions.

“The better we understand a company, the better positioned we are to regulate it appropriately while maintaining the high standards Vermont is known for.”

Petterson believes this approach offers lessons well beyond Vermont itself.

“If there's one lesson that could benefit the broader captive industry, it's that innovation and strong regulation are not at odds with each other. In fact, they work best together.”

Continuous learning also remains essential as new technologies, business models and emerging risks reshape the insurance landscape.

“At the end of the day, good regulation isn't about checking boxes,” he concludes. “It's about exercising sound judgment. That takes experience, communication, and a willingness to understand each company's unique circumstances.”

In an increasingly complex captive market, Vermont's enduring competitive advantage may therefore be less about legislation than relationships—an approach built patiently over four decades and one that continues to evolve alongside the industry it regulates.

Dan Petterson is director of examinations at the Vermont Department of Financial Regulation. He can be contacted at: dan.petterson@vermont.gov

Did you get value from this story?  Sign up to our free daily newsletters and get stories like this sent straight to your inbox.