21 September 2018Analysis

Rely on existing regulations for European captives, FERMA urges OECD

The Federation of European Risk Management Associations (FERMA) has urged the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) to use existing international regulations governing captive insurance companies when it publishes new guidelines on transfer pricing and value creation.

A frequent concern of the OECD when considering the transfer pricing of captive transactions is whether the transaction concerned is genuinely one of insurance - for example whether a risk exists and, if so, whether it is allocated to the captive in light of the facts and Circumstances.

FERMA argued that a further layer of regulations to be applied by national regulatory authorities could create a risk of confusion, uncertainty and ultimately more administration for multinationals and tax authorities without providing the desired outcome for tax authorities.

The association said that IFRS 17 and the International Association of Insurance Supervisors (IAIS) already provide definitions for terms which OECD is considering: “genuine insurance transaction” and “insurable risks”.

FERMA suggested that IAIS guidelines are also extremely stringent about the control of various functions of a captive such as direction, underwriting, actuarial and accounting expertise. Furthermore, it said Solvency II regulations are applied to captives as they are to all other insurance companies, but in a manner proportional to their size and activities.

More on this story

Cayman analysis
28 November 2022   Cayman’s Finance Minister explains how Government has worked to bolster financial standards.
Accounting & tax analysis
18 December 2017   The Minister of Finance for the Bahamas signed a Multilateral Convention on Mutual Administrative Assistance in Tax Matters. With this signing, The Bahamas becomes the 116th jurisdiction to join the world’s leading instrument for boosting transparency and combating cross-border tax evasion.
Accounting & tax analysis
17 July 2017   With the OECD’s base erosion and profit shifting (BEPS) measures rolling out in the US, captive insurance companies find themselves under increased scrutiny from the IRS, which wants to clamp down on potential tax avoidance vehicles. US Captive explores the implications.