13 March 2018Analysis

Small captives continue to be popular but must exercise caution


In light of recent IRS scrutiny and pending case law decisions, the captive insurance industry must self-police and ensure it promotes industry best practices.

This is according to a panel at the CICA 2018 International Conference, “Enterprise Risk Captives - Getting it Right,” featuring speakers Michael Serricchio, managing director of Marsh Captive Solutions; Steven Miller, national director of tax at alliantgroup; Thomas Cyr, partner at KPMG; and Adam Miholic, assistant vice president, Marsh Captive Solutions.

The panel acknowledged that there has been a slowdown in the formation of new captives.

“Generally what we’re seeing is that larger captives and middle market captives are growing, but liquidations are happening,” said Serricchio.

He said he has not seen a slowdown in 831(b) captives, in fact the increased premium threshold from $1.2 to $2.2 million has created a lot of opportunity for companies that would not have previously thought about captives.

“Avrahami cases and some of the literature out there is helping us police the industry and get it right,” he said. “You’ve got to have a company willing to take risk, willing to take loss and willing to put up capital.”

A number of states have also embraced small captives, for example, North Carolina, Tennessee, Utah and Delaware.

However, other jurisdictions have taken a different approach. “Some domiciles don’t want to be viewed as a small captive jurisdictions,” said Miller.

Miller also noted that in his practice he had not seen a drop off in small captives being formed.

Serricchio added that he is starting to see more agency captives emerge.

“With the right fit with premium volume increased - there are tremendous opportunities to have agency captives that qualify as an 831(b) - there may be MGAs (managing general agents) or MGUs (managing general underwriters) considering these options,” he explained.

The panel stressed the important of having a reasonable business plan with a well-thought out feasibility study.

Cyr added that captives - not just small captives - can offer flexibility in coverage that the traditional market is not selling.


More on this story

Analysis
13 March 2018   Captive insurance companies with cyber policies could benefit from the financial backstop provided by the US Terrorism Risk Insurance Act (TRIA) programme, however, there are concerns around the wording of the programme with regard to the definition of terrorism and programme triggers.
Analysis
12 March 2018   Most companies are grappling with how to manage cyber risk – and more are turning their attention to captives as a risk management tool that can play an important role in this.
Analysis
13 March 2018   Captive programmes can significantly contribute to healthcare cost containment and improve employee health in both the US and in other major territories where employers offer employee healthcare programmes.

More on this story

Analysis
13 March 2018   Captive insurance companies with cyber policies could benefit from the financial backstop provided by the US Terrorism Risk Insurance Act (TRIA) programme, however, there are concerns around the wording of the programme with regard to the definition of terrorism and programme triggers.
Analysis
12 March 2018   Most companies are grappling with how to manage cyber risk – and more are turning their attention to captives as a risk management tool that can play an important role in this.
Analysis
13 March 2018   Captive programmes can significantly contribute to healthcare cost containment and improve employee health in both the US and in other major territories where employers offer employee healthcare programmes.